Iberdrola accepts NY PSC conditions on Energy East purchase

Iberdrola announced that it accepts the conditions imposed by the New York Public Service Commission (PSC) on the company’s bid to purchase Energy East. In a statement, the company noted that its

decision came following analysis of the conditions stipulated by the New York State Public Services Commission (NYPSC) in voting to approve the transaction on September 3 and in the order granting approval issued September 9, which IBERDOLA considered to be consistent with the financial and value creation criteria it has set for corporate transactions.In particular, the NYPSC authorization, containing conditions customary to this kind of transaction, involves no limitation on IBERDROLA’s ability to develop wind power activities in the State of New York.

The company states that with the transaction it is now Spain’s largest investor in the United States. Iberdrola’s (English language) press release is here. For purists, the Spanish-language release is here.

The PSC’s abbreviated order is found here. A longer final order will issue at a later date. The PSC abandoned reasoning of PSC staff and the administrative law judge charged with investigating the transaction. Rather than deny the transaction on public interest grounds, the commissioners found that the transaction will benefit consumers.

Under the PSL [Public Service Law] §70 “public interest” criterion applicable to this proposed transaction, petitioners must show that the transaction would provide ratepayers a positive net benefit. Here, we have weighed the expected benefits from the transaction against related risks and detriments remaining after applying reasonable mitigation measures. We conclude that, with the provision of the positive benefit adjustments (PBAs) and the conditions ordered here, Iberdrola’s acquisition of the Energy East companies will provide ratepayers sufficient positive net benefits to warrant its approval under PSL §70.

Wind, of course, played a significant role in the discussion of the transaction. Not suprising given Iberdrola’s renewables focus and the compelling symmetry between maps of New York wind resources and the map of Energy East distribution and transmission shown in the Iberdrola press release above. The PSC had some words to say about wind:

We conclude that Iberdrola’s ongoing participation in the New York State wind industry offers some benefit in advancing our renewable energy goals. Therefore, consistent with our existing policy of using wind development as an important means of achieving those goals, we do not condition our approval here on a prohibition against Iberdrola’s development or ownership of wind facilities in the State.

Indeed, to strengthen Iberdrola’s commitment to invest in renewables in New York, we will condition our approval of the transaction upon a requirement that Iberdrola commit to make wind-related capital investments in New York worth $200 million. [Note: We note an ambiguity in both petitioners’ [earlier submissions in which] Iberdrola commits “to support” an investment of $100 million in renewable generation. Given Iberdrola’s 80% ownership interest in Iberdrola Renewables and its capacity to create other means to make such an investment, we resolve this ambiguity by requiring Iberdrola to make, rather than merely support, such an investment, and we increase the required investment from $100 million to $200 million.] This requirement will be subject to the same contingency Iberdrola placed on its original $100 million commitment, namely, that there be “no material adverse change to the existing fundamental economics of wind generation development in New York State.” [Note: … According to petitioners’ qualification, this condition would relieve Iberdrola of its commitment should the federal production tax credit [PTC] or our renewable portfolio standard [RPS] subsidies be eliminated or reduced, or should there be material changes in the market price for power in the market maintained by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO)…] However, this qualification does not extend to the economics of any individual wind project, such as land rights acquisition, turbine rights acquisition, financing, construction, interconnection, or operation and maintenance. [Note omitted]

This capital investment requirement applies to incremental investment in construction of new wind projects, as distinguished from investment in or acquisition of existing wind resources or sums already spent on projects underway. This requirement may be satisfied by new investments in wind projects within New York State that are made during the initial two years following the acquisition’s closing date. We are willing to consider, however, upon a petition from Iberdrola, a modest extension of the two-year period.

With wind project costs at somewhere between $2 and $3 per watt (and, generally speaking, rising), this presumably would result in some 60-100 megawatts of additional wind generation in the state, the size of a wind farm not atypical in New York state. (By contrast, the state’s largest wind farm, Maple Ridge, partially owned by an Iberdrola subsidiary, is some 325 megawatts).

One of the investment caveats is particularly noteworthy. The federal production tax credit or PTC is set to expire at the end of this year, and Congress has shown only moderate inclination to extend it (or at least to attempt to extend it without also including other extraneous matters). While this blogger has spoken with some wind industry players who believe the industry is mature enough as a whole to withstand a PTC gap of some time, if history is a guide, much development in the country will stop or fail if the PTC is not extended. More concretely for this transaction, a PTC gap may be a kicker for some wind development in the state. Per the PSC decision, should Iberdrola not invest the $200M over two years for any reason, the company is required to contribute up to $25M toward economic development projects in the Energy East service territory.

New York wind energy developments

East Bloomfield (Ontario County) adopts wind ordinance

The Daily Messenger (8/28) reports that

Tipping its hat to the town Planning Board members and critics who have jousted with them during the drafting of a windmill law, the Town Board on Monday unanimously passed a revised version on its second attempt.

Henderson (Jefferson County) wind project under consideration

From the Watertown Daily Times (9/2)

A fledgling investment group is eyeing the town as a location for a wind power project.

Ronald J. Scrudato has talked to town Supervisor Clyde E. Moore and one landowner. He represents an investment firm so young, it’s name isn’t set yet. But so far, it’s called Delfea and it is based in New Jersey.

Herkimer County conflict allegations

From the Utica Observer-Dispatch (8/30)

At least one Stark Town Board member and three town Zoning Board of Appeals members have signed leases with the developer behind the Jordanville Wind Project, according to Herkimer County property records. Stark town officials said they have been paying close attention to these potential conflicts of interest and have followed legal advice to make sure they haven’t done anything wrong.

Jefferson County wind project tax breaks discussed, criticized

From the Watertown Daily Times (8/31)

Money doesn’t grow on trees, but it may grow on windmills. The developers of the four proposed wind farms in Jefferson County could capitalize on tax breaks and incentives at the federal, state and local levels through their projects. Opponents say the subsidies take taxpayer money and give it to those who already are rich.

New York wind energy updates

Wind Project in Evans

Buffalo News reports that the Town of Evans (Erie County) is considering various wind facilities siting laws.

Wind Power Court Case

Evening Tribune reports that a court case in the Appellate Division of the Fourth Judicial Department aimed at stopping Everpower’s 25-turbine development in the Town of Howard (Steuben County) continues. The Town Board is overseeing the environmental review of the project, per another article.

GE Energy Report on Federal Tax Credits

GE Energy Financial Services released a report concluding that federal tax credits for wind are more than made up with taxes, profits and wages. The study estimates that

a federal tax incentive [the Production Tax Credit or PTC] set to expire Dec. 31 for wind energy projects more than pays for itself through tax revenues from the projects’ income, vendors’ profits and individual workers’ wages. The study – released at the American Council on Renewable Energy’s Renewable Energy Finance Forum in New York – estimated that wind farms built in 2007, supported by the production tax credit, carry a net present value benefit to the US Treasury of $250 million.

Jordanville Wind Project

Observer and Dispatch of Utica reports that Iberdrola’s Jordanville wind project has been scaled back after the Town lost a court case. The Town has apparently decided not to appeal. Instead, per reports, Iberdrola intends to submit plans for a project reduced from 68 to 40 turbines.

Technorati Profile

Schenectady daily resoundingly endorses wind energy, Iberdrola-Energy East proposed deal

A June 8 editorial from the Daily Gazette of Schenectady begins:

Wind energy is important to the country, which is why Congress should renew federal tax credits when they expire at the end of the year. It is also important to New York state and Schenectady, which is why the proposed takeover of Energy East by the Spanish utility Iberdrola should be approved, and why Schenectady’s colleges should be joining with General Electric to train workers for this emerging industry.

Complete editorial here.

Thomas Friedman criticizes lack of federal energy policy

According to Friedman in a 4/30/2008 New York Times opinion piece, “…for almost a year now, Congress has been bickering over whether and how to renew the investment tax credit to stimulate investment in solar energy and the production tax credit to encourage investment in wind energy… [The credits] for wind and solar have been left to expire this December.”

In an 88-8 overwhelmingly bi-partisan vote (on H.R. 3221), the U.S. Senate passed on April 10, 2008 a one-year extension of the production tax credit (PTC) (through December 31, 2009) . Action by the House (and signing by the President) is necessary to see the extension become law.